Article
From A Reader:
Covering Fake Wood
Grain Paneling
|
Related
Articles:
|
Chris Kinnamon of Baytown, Texas describes a technique
used to cover up unwanted paneling:
A friend of mine purchased a home recently which was structurally
sound but in desperate need of a cosmetic freshening. The house is
about 25 years old, and like many houses of that vintage it doesn't
have drywall. No, for some inexplicable reason fake woodgrain
paneling was popular in those days and that's exactly what all of
the inside walls were covered with.
We weren't terribly excited by the prospect of tearing down all the
old paneling, then measuring, cutting, and sanding drywall for every
room in the house. Frankly, that would have been way too expensive
for my friend's budget, not to mention the fact that we have never
worked with drywall
before. (It also doesn't help that we are a bit lazy!) Instead, we
asked around and discovered that it is possible to make cheap tacky
paneling look like drywall by simply rolling on drywall mud.
The first step for us was to pull off all the old trim and primer
the paneling. We used Behr primer formulated especially for
paneling, but also found that Glidden primer ($25 for 5 gallons at
Lowe's) worked just as well. We rolled on a total of two coats.
The next step was very important for giving the illusion of drywall.
Most paneling that you will see in stores has the cheap woodgrain
look, but also has grooves cut every 8 to 10 inches, which
supposedly furthers the illusion. We found that rolling mud over
these grooves does not completely hide them! The mud shrinks down
and "telegraphs" the surface underneath. To get a truly
flat surface, we took adhesive drywall tape--the "mesh"
tape--and simply covered over the seams. We found that this is the
only method that works. We tried filling in the seams with mud,
spackling compound, etc. and they shrink down after drying and show
the seam anyway. Mesh tape is definitely the best product to use.
So far the work had gone fast, but that was about to change. The
next step was to apply the drywall mud. We used 5-gallon buckets of
mud, and scooped the contents into a paint tray. Next we put a
looped brush onto an ordinary paint roller, and rolled it back and
forth to gather up some mud. After
that, we simply rolled up and down to get a nice texture. At first
we noticed a very coarse texture, but as we rolled over the same
area several times (with less and less pressure on the wall) the
texture got smaller and smaller, until it looked like real drywall.
This process was pretty slow and tedious, but then again so is
putting up drywall. The difference is this required hardly any skill
at all.
We found out the hard way that Sheetrock brand name mud is the
easiest to apply. We saved 50 cents per bucket when we bought
no-name mud, but it was too thick, which made it difficult and
time-consuming to apply. We also learned not to use
"texture" paint. It costs much more, and it is way too
thin to fill in seams or imperfections of any size.
We let the wall texture dry overnight. The next day we were excited
by how much better it looked than dark, gloomy paneling! We then
proceeded to paint the walls--big mistake. Without applying primer
to the bare texture, the paint had poor coverage. It seems that
texture is like a sponge, and it soaked up our expensive brand-name
paint. Even worse, it must have soaked up some pigments in the paint
more than others, because our light beige paint appeared to have a
strong pink tint to it! By applying primer before painting we solved
both these problems.
After painting the walls and applying some nice looking white trim,
the house looks completely different! For a few hundred dollars and
a modest amount of unskilled labor, we were able to achieve a look
almost identical to professionally installed drywall. Our method was
cheaper, easier, and much
faster than installing drywall ourselves. In addition, the wood
paneling is still in place, which means that my friend can hang
pictures and so forth without having to find a stud to nail into.
The only disadvantage (if you want to call it that) is that rolled
texture looks a little different than the usual sprayed texture you
see in new homes. Not bad, just different. We still have one room
left, and we may try watering down the mud so that we can spray it
through a texture gun, in order to get the sprayed look (and more
importantly, to save time). We're not sure if thinner mud will fill
in the seams adequately, so we will probably try this method on a
piece of scrap paneling before doing the entire room.
Editor's notes:
I had a few concerns with their approach.
- The paneling might flex (with humidity changes,
or from being bumped) and the drywall mud might crack and
pop off. The compound certainly does stick to everything
(We have an aluminum ladder that is covered with it -- the
stuff sticks!) but the mud is not highly flexible.
- Surface adhesion. They were absolutely correct in
applying primer to the paneling. But the primer may not
hold to paneling that has a glossy surface. I made that
mistake years ago when I painted the ugly paneling in a
garage. The paint peeled away in huge strips. I have since
learned that all I needed to do was give it a light
scuff-sanding. (There are de-glossing chemicals available
at professional paint stores.)
|
Chris responds:
Regarding the durability of the wall texture, I cannot honestly
say that I know 100% that it will withstand the test of time, since
it has only been up 5 or 6 months. I can say, however, that we have
driven nails into it quite vigorously for hanging pictures and
putting up trim. It seems to be very durable stuff, we looked
closely and didn't notice any cracking whatsoever. We have pushed on
the paneling, flexed it, even banged on it pretty good with our
fists and we cannot get anything to break loose. Humidity has not
been a problem either. Neither the cold, dry air in January or the
miserably humid spring air has caused any problems. Another friend
of ours did the same for an even older house a year ago and hasn't
had problems either.
I would mostly recommend this method for those who are planning
on tearing down their paneling and putting up drywall anyway. If the
walls go bad in a couple years, we tear it down like we had planned
to begin with, and all we've wasted has been spare time and a very
modest amount spent on primer and mud.
A couple of extra notes: It probably would have been a good idea
to sand before applying primer. A cheap dual action sander wouldn't
have hurt. Still, our paneling didn't exactly have a glass-smooth
finish, and our primer specifically said that it would stick to
paneling.
More Editor's Notes:
Good! Their method passed the Banging-On-The-Wall
test and the Driving-A-Nail-Into-It test. (no, these are not
ASTM or ANSI tests, they are HammerZone.com tests!)
I also mentioned to Chris that I had worked on a similar
house, built in the 1970's, that had ugly paneling. The
homeowner removed some and discovered drywall underneath.
(Most likely the building code would have required drywall for
fire protection.) But the drywall was hung in small pieces,
without any concern for aligning the beveled edges. Taping the
joints would have been a major chore, so the homeowner bought
some heavy embossed wallpaper at The Home Depot, which covered
the drywall seams very well. |
Chris explains:
There is no drywall at all under any of the paneling. We didn't
think about that, we just assumed that since the building inspector
checked everything out, there weren't any problems. (Actually there
was drywall at one time, but the house flooded with an inch of water
before the city dug the ditches properly. That's how my friend got
such a good price on an all-brick 3 bedroom house. The previous
owners took the easy path and threw on some paneling, and replaced
the carpet with cheap vinyl flooring everywhere--I guess replacing
that is next!)
Final Editor's Note:
It's not surprising to learn that after a flood a homeowner
had replaced damaged drywall with paneling. Knowing how few
people carry flood insurance, this would be perhaps the only
affordable repair for many homeowners. And since such a repair
would not require a building permit (at least in our area),
it's possible that a house could end up with a
less-than-code-mandated fire resistance. This happens far more
than it should, whether it be a flood or just plain old
remodeling that causes the change.
But adding a layer of drywall compound could be a
significant improvement in fire resistance, since the compound
is very much flame resistant. Although the thin coating will
probably not equal the fire resistance of 1/2" gypsum
wallboard, it is certainly an improvement over paneling. Just
make sure your friend has working smoke detectors, Chris,
several of them.
Also, we noticed a product advertised in Old House
Interiors magazine, called Plaster-Weld, made by Larsen
Products. (www.larsenproducts.com
or 1-800-633-6668) This product lets you apply thin-coat
plaster over drywall, instead of having to use blueboard. They
claim that even painted or wallpapered drywall can be covered
with thin-coat plaster, using their product. Perhaps their
product will work on paneling.
Bruce W. Maki, Editor |
Back To Top
Of Page
Search
Page
Home
What's New Project
Archives H.I.
World
Rants
Contact Us
|
|